Sean "Diddy" Combs' high-profile sex trafficking trial is nearing its end. On Tuesday, the defense rested its case. They chose not to call any witnesses and made a brief presentation that lasted less than 30 minutes. This followed seven weeks of testimony and evidence from federal prosecutors in New York. They argued that Diddy ran a criminal enterprise. The charges include sex trafficking, racketeering, and transporting individuals for prostitution. If convicted, he could face a life sentence.

The prosecution portrayed Diddy as the mastermind of a disturbing network of coercion and exploitation. They said he used his fame, wealth, and power to traffic both women and men. These victims were allegedly used for drug-fueled sexual events, often recorded and referred to as “freak-offs” or “hotel nights.” Prosecutors supported their claims with testimony from over 30 witnesses. They also presented explicit video clips and digital evidence, including travel records and text messages.

In contrast, the defense presented a short rebuttal, submitting a handful of text messages between Diddy and key accusers such as ex-girlfriend Casandra "Cassie" Ventura and another woman known as "Jane." One message read in court stated, “I always have fun,” which the defense used to argue that the encounters were consensual. Attorney Alexandra Shapiro contended that the government had failed to meet its burden of proof, emphasizing that the women involved were capable of making their own choices. She acknowledged instances of alleged domestic violence but stressed that such behavior does not constitute sex trafficking under the law.

Diddy also confirmed in court that he would not testify in his own defense, a common legal strategy to avoid self-incrimination. In a brief exchange with Judge Arun Subramanian, Diddy stated that it was his personal decision, made in consultation with his legal team. He also took a moment to compliment the judge, saying that the judge was doing an excellent job.

With closing arguments scheduled to begin Thursday, the jury will soon decide the fate of the 55-year-old music mogul. The case, which has drawn widespread public and media attention, highlights serious allegations about abuse of power and the complexities of consent, coercion, and accountability in the world of celebrity and influence.